Ah, that's a shame to miss all those things, Fritz, but the stress test comes first in priority.

G'nite Debbie, just weights tomorrow, we're not singing at the nursing home because there would be no piano player.

81 and humid here at 11.

I'd draw the line.

 

I watched The Hangover, Part II last night. Just wanted some simple, no thinking entertainment! 

I've never seen any of the films in "THE HANGOVER" series, they sound like they wouldn't really interest me.  However, there's nothing wrong with movies that provide light entertainment that don't require you to take them seriously.  They can be fun.  Heck, I may not be a teenager, but I think Amy Heckerling's "CLUELESS" (1995) and Tina Fey's "MEAN GIRLS" (2004) are always fun to watch.  They deal with bullying, teenage life, high school, the last clothing fashions, a societal outcast who manages to join the "in" crowd, finding your first love, popularity, being true to yourself etc.; all interesting social themes, but they do it in a thoughtful comedic manner.  Light entertainment can still discuss serious issues- and they can sometimes deal with them in a unique way.

^^^ More than we the public will ever know.  Unless someone with a set of @@ is willing to take a $$ risk on such smaller "indy" films, they never see the light of day.  There's another script/book I wish Ossana would consider backing / making but perhaps 1 "highly controversial film" a lifetime is enough.  V.

So true.  I feel that the most controversial movies sometimes tend to be the most interesting ones.